The latest numbers indicate that Windows 8 isn't boosting the weak PC notebook market, causing some manufacturers to blame Microsoft for poor sales. But Paul Thurrott, longtime Microsoft enthusiast and founder of SuperSite for Windows,
argues that Windows 8 isn't dragging down manufacturers — it's the
other way around. "Many of [Microsoft's] 20 million Windows 7 licenses
each month," Thurrott writes,
"went to machines that are basically throwaway, plastic crap." Blaming
netbooks particularly, he says that cheap notebook sales conditioned
customers to "expect to pay next to nothing" for Windows machines, a
strategy that backfired when Microsoft started optimizing Windows 8 for
more expensive touch-based displays. His sentiment echoes that of NPD,
which concluded in a private report that netbooks did "an incalculable
amount of damage" to the PC market.
We've written before about the potential of touch displays,
as well as the problems they pose for current-gen hardware. Thurrott's
suggestions for solving the touchscreen conundrum are largely
cost-based: prices, he says, need to come down enough to occupy a place
between cheap Android tablets and higher-priced iPads. For that to
happen, though, manufacturers would have to shave several hundred
dollars off the prices of touch-enabled machines, shifting focus from
high-specced ultrabooks to cheaper notebooks and ARM devices. And
considering the problems both netbooks and the ARM-based Surface have
seen, that introduces a whole new set of issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment